Showing posts with label vaccines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccines. Show all posts

Friday, June 12, 2026

Cuba and Trump Fear or Control?

 The relationship of the United States with Cuba over 200 years has been examined from the point of view of both fear and imperialism. 

Fear of Cuban Life and Health?


Some observers cite fear of Cuba that may have originated in the time of the Monroe Doctrine of the “imminent domain of the United States” or the abolition of slavery in Cuba as a threat to the economy of the Southern States.


In the sixty years since the Cuban Revolution, the contrast between the health and education systems of Cuba and the United States is most visible in the priority that the Cuban administration puts in a health system that focuses on state paid care that places medical professionals in the communities and focuses on preventive health care, helping people be well, as opposed to “sick” care curing disease. At the same time, Cuban medical research centres have focused on developing vaccines for the many diseases that are particularly prevalent in tropical regions.


 

A small but growing number of U.S. citizens are travelling to Havana for a breakthrough new treatment for Alzheimer’s, Cuba’s NeuralCIM. Alzheimer’s is a disease that systematically destroys a person's memory, personality, and ability to function.




Cuban medical schools train medical personnel for Cuba and many countries of the Global South. Cuban medical professions assist in providing health care in many other countries. The metrics of live births and life expectancy have continuously improved in Cuba until the recent genocidal blockade of Cuba by the Trump Regime that has denied oil for generating electricity for refrigerators, water pumps, schools, and hospitals. Some of the increased deaths since the embargo have been in the neo-natal wards of hospitals.


The argument that the “Private Enterprise” health care favoured by many, including “Big Pharma” in the United States, may feel threatened by a lower cost, innovation focused, universally accessible, internationally celebrated, research and development based health system focused on the ideal that “health is a human right” deserves careful consideration.


The military strategists advising the Trump regime have renewed the 19th Century imperialism that the United States is the proper and destined governing influence in the American Hemisphere (Western Hemisphere) and that includes the Gulf of America (Gulf of Mexico). Under this imperialist resurgence, Cuba (and Canada) are territories that may exert influence on access to the United States much like Iran can influence access to Middle East countries by controlling the Strait of Hormuz. Unlike Iran, Canada and Mexico, have trade, social, commercial, resource, and military alliances with the United States that would make life more expensive for Americans if a “rupture” in relationships continues. 


The imperialist promoters of American exceptionalism need to recall that the “melting pot” of the American Republic owes its exceptional position to the integration of people and ideas from all nations of the world. The history of empires that tried to reign from power and false notions of superiority is one of “Rise and Fall”. 




Tuesday, February 15, 2022

Temporary and Fulfilled

The decision of the Government to use the Emergencies Act as a temporary measure to control the illegal aspects of the “Freedom Convoy” occupation of areas of the country may become a permanent example to anarchists of extreme government overreach.
A man waves a flag while taking part in the convoy protest against vaccine mandates in Ottawa. (CBC / Radio-Canada)


John Paul Tasker, of CBC News, explains what the Emergencies Act means.

In this instance, the act is being invoked to deal with a public order emergency. This means the cabinet has the power to prohibit "public assembly that may reasonably be expected to lead to a breach of the peace," to prohibit travel to, from or within any specified area, to forbid the use of a "specified property" and to secure "protected places." The cabinet can also direct any person or class of person to "render essential services" and gives the government the power to regulate the "distribution and availability of essential goods."... Trudeau said the federal powers will be used to prohibit people from illegally gathering in the city's downtown core and to order tow truck companies in the area to help remove big rigs used in the protests… The cabinet is also directing banks and financial institutions to halt the flow of funds to protest organizers through amendments to the Proceeds of Crime and Terrorist Financing Act.1
 

On the other hand, the predictable, controlled, and monitored lifting of temporary COVID restrictions by provincial public health authorities was an opportunity for anarchist elements who know frustration with these measures might be both a rallying point and an opportunity to claim a win. Being mindful of the TEMPORARY nature of the Emergencies Act and the Covid restrictions is extremely important to avoid overreaction to these events.
Monitor the trends

 

Steve Scherer and Nichola Saminather report, for Reuters, on how the Emergencies Act can squeeze funding for the trucker protests.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Monday invoked rarely-used special measures to end protests that have shut some border crossings and paralyzed downtown Ottawa. He said he would invoke the Emergencies Act to deal with the "Freedom Convoy" protests, started on Jan. 28 by Canadian truckers opposing a vaccinate-or-quarantine mandate for cross-border drivers. They have turned into a rallying point for people opposed to a range of Trudeau's policies, including COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and a carbon tax. The demonstrations shut a main economic corridor between Canada and the United States for six days before it was reopened on Sunday2
 

The majority in Canada respect the value of enjoying an environment of peace, order, and good government where they live and the respect the rights of people to demonstrate for change through the democratic processes that protect us all. This is not a right respected by anarchists who act by denying freedom to fellow citizens and seek replacement of democracy with autocracy.

 

References

1

(2022, February 14). The federal government has invoked the Emergencies Act ... - CBC. Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/emergencies-act-explainer-1.6351504 

2

(2022, February 14). Factbox: Canada's Emergencies Act: how will it squeeze funding of .... Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canadas-emergencies-act-what-it-would-allow-quell-protests-against-pandemic-2022-02-14/ 

 


Sunday, September 19, 2021

My body my choice

Some recent serendipity has brought memories of time with my grandchildren this summer and concern over rising individualism in our society to the forefront of my mind.

Kinship experience


A commentary by Deacon William T. Ditewig, Ph.D. on the Limits of Choice, Personal Freedom and the Common Good concludes “The bottom line is that “my body, my choice” is an inadequate and flawed argument no matter who makes it.” 


My personal freedom extends only as far as the personal freedom of others. At some point, the moral choice is to surrender a measure of personal freedom for the common good of all. Consider how we veterans are often greeted: “Thank you for your service!” It is acknowledged that, as a class of people, military personnel put their own personal freedom aside to a degree in order to benefit their comrades and the country. Taking the vaccination, even under a mandate, is less about one’s personal good than it is about the good of others.1


When we look at vaccination through the slice of reality that concentrates on scientific analysis and focuses on what we can measure with our traditional senses most of the Canadian population accepts vaccination as a means to reduce the “viral load” in the population, reduce the chances of the unvaccinated acquiring serious infection, and reduce the pressure on our health care system of over crowded ICU’s and exhausted health care workers.


Thinking about the time with my grandchildren, two of whom are too young for vaccination, I am aware of a reality outside our experience with the slice based on measurement and physical senses. I am connected to my grandchildren in a kinship based on love that extends my good feelings for them to care as if they were my body. I am reminded of the times when calling their names, I address them by their father’s name or conversely, they address me as “Dad”. This familial connection is a step beyond a narrow perception of reality and the individual. Neuroscience may be able to identify how different areas of the brain “light up” in response to connection with loved ones. 


In the past year, I spent some time in treatment, surgery, and recovery. One realization coming from that time is that the prayers and good wishes of people support healing. Another insight is that the person receiving emotional and physical support from others also incurs an obligation to also act to support his own recovery and healing.


The connection of kinship denies the argument “my body, my choice”. When we imagine the characteristics of a better world, we see that one step involves understanding that all humanity is connected. Our choices are influenced by the needs of others and our actions impact the lives of others. 


An earlier blog post “Discerning Benefits for all in Culture Wars” ( http://tinyurl.com/y223u2hh  ) offers support for the idea that opportunity for more common ground than difference in the Culture Wars may lead to replacement of dualistic confrontation with mutual appreciation and understanding.


1(2021, August 21). The Limits of Choice: Personal Freedom and the Common Good. Retrieved August 22, 2021, from https://billditewig.blog/2021/08/21/the-limits-of-choice-personal-freedom-and-the-common-good/ 

Thursday, September 9, 2021

Some Common Ground for the Common Good

I am stuck by many paradox in the political battles concerning our ethical and legal approach to “life issues” like abortion, capital punishment, euthanasia, and war. I have worked with some folks on one side of some of these issues and then have found the same people on the opposite side of another of these issues. Sometimes those most concerned about government control of their lives are strong advocates of a legal solution to these issues. Within Christianity, I suggest that the model of surrender of our rights, possessions, and life for the good of the other is well presented by Jesus. Many thoughtful Christians have worked to educate and provide witness in action to help those in need while attempting to formulate and practice a consistent ethic of life.

Working for the Common Good

 

Discerning Benefits for all in Culture Wars ( http://tinyurl.com/y223u2hh ) offers support for the idea that opportunity for more common ground than difference in the Culture Wars may lead to replacement of dualistic confrontation with mutual appreciation and understanding.

 

Charles C. Camosy, associate professor of theological and social ethics at Fordham University, affirms a consistent life ethic in the strongest possible terms. This includes not only considering many more issues than abortion, but also focusing on the well-being of women and families.


We urge all Catholics to resist the false choice between “supply” and “demand” approaches to abortion; that is, between opposing the practice of abortion (the supply side) and addressing the root causes that lead to abortion (the demand side). But an authentically Catholic consistent life ethic means treating prenatal children as the equivalent of every other human being. When we do that, and then simply “do the math,” it is easy to see why fundamental justice for prenatal children is the pre-eminent justice issue of our time.1


Deacon William T. Ditewig, Ph.D. was speaking recently with a fellow Catholic who is against mandates concerning vaccinations or masks during this time of COVID-19. The language was interesting. “It’s all about my personal freedom. As Catholics, we have free will and as Americans we have individual rights. I should be able to make my own decisions without anyone else (especially the government) taking that freedom away. “It’s my body; it’s my choice.”


Do I have a right to refuse to take the vaccine? The answer is not an absolute yes or no, but maybe. Does society have a right to regulate my behavior despite my personal freedom? “My body, my choice” is again insufficient. My personal freedom extends only as far as the personal freedom of others. At some point, the moral choice is to surrender a measure of personal freedom for the common good of all. Consider how we veterans are often greeted: “Thank you for your service!” It is acknowledged that, as a class of people, military personnel put their own personal freedom aside to a degree in order to benefit their comrades and the country. Taking the vaccination, even under a mandate, is less about one’s personal good than it is about the good of others. For people of faith, we need only look to St. Paul, who reminded the Philippians: “Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility regard others as better than yourselves. Let each of you look not to your own interests, but to the interests of others.” (Philippians 2:3-4). The bottom line is that “my body, my choice” is an inadequate and flawed argument no matter who makes it.2



Renée Darline Roden, holds a bachelor’s and master’s degree from the University of Notre Dame and currently works as an editor for FaithND and as a playwright in New York City. Her writing has appeared in Howlround, Church Life Journal, and Image Journal’s Good Letters, is suggesting that pro-life Catholics think as much about mores and social structures as they do about legislation. In order to achieve full justice on the issue of abortion, the moral discussion has to explore the personal and theological relationships that laws incarnate and reflect but cannot dictate.


To attempt to outlaw abortion without caring whether or not abortions will occur illegally or without caring why so many women see abortion as so essential to their freedom, health and happiness is shortsighted. And it is that blindspot that makes the pro-life political apparatus appear so misogynist and cruel to its political counterparts. A movement that wants to end abortions has to listen to the voices of women demanding change. It has to seriously consider why women—particularly impoverished women—see abortion as a necessity. Until all economic and social structures of sexism are transformed and the patriarchal mores in our hearts and relationships are converted, there will always be unwanted pregnancies. And if there are unwanted pregnancies, there will be abortions. To think otherwise is wishful thinking.3


The possibility of common ground for the common good in the culture wars may, as a beginning, lie in working for the well being of women and families, discussion of benefits to society from limiting some personal choice, and working to transform economic and social structures of sexism. Our real overlap with people who disagree with some of our efforts is our ability to respect and work with them on other ethical and moral aspects that improve life in our common home.

 

References

1

(2021, July 8). Consistent-life-ethic Catholics can (and should) treat abortion as .... Retrieved July 9, 2021, from https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2021/07/08/abortion-politics-us-bishops-eucharist-ethics-240991 


2

(2021, August 21). The Limits of Choice: Personal Freedom and the Common Good. Retrieved August 22, 2021, from https://billditewig.blog/2021/08/21/the-limits-of-choice-personal-freedom-and-the-common-good/ 


3

(2021, September 8). Pro-life Catholics: You can't end abortion ... - America Magazine. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2021/09/08/texas-sb-8-heartbeat-abortion-women-241365 


 

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Why so many people practice 'denialism’


A segment of the CBC “The Sunday Edition” program, broadcast on August 19, 2018, inspired this curation of articles by asking the question “ Why so many people practice 'denialism’ ?”.
Denial

Keith Kahn-Harris, a lecturer at Birkbeck College, University of London and at Leo Baeck College, and an associate fellow at the Institute for Jewish Policy Research, offers ideas from his latest book, called Denial: The Unspeakable Truth. Keith Kahn-Harris has a theory about why so many people reject scientific consensus and documented historical fact.
Some issues

He calls it denialism and argues that it is making the practice of politics and public policy more difficult and divisive.
Truth seeking

Statements that are backed by denialism include:
  • The Holocaust never happened. 
  • The planet isn’t warming. 
  • Vaccines cause autism. 
  • There is no such thing as AIDS. 
  • The Earth is flat. 
The BBC recently reported that measles cases hit a record high in Europe.
Dr Nedret Emiroglu, from the WHO, said: "This partial setback demonstrates that every under-immunised person remains vulnerable no matter where they live and every country must keep pushing to increase coverage and close immunity gaps."
Italy's upper house of parliament recently voted through legislation to abolish the law that makes vaccination mandatory for children before they start school. The amendment will mean parents of unvaccinated children will no longer face fines.
Jeremy Hance, a leading environmental reporter, and occasional contributor to ALERT, reports a trend in temperature that predicts it will be “unseasonably hot till 2022”.
While the prediction for the next 5 years is anything but good, it may provide a political opportunity to convince leaders and the public of the urgency of combating global warming.  Perhaps unsurprisingly, humans are more easily convinced of the reality of global warming when it happens to be hot outside.
Keith Kahn-Harris writes in the Guardian, about trends in recent years where the term ‘denialism” has been used to describe a number of fields of “scholarship”, whose scholars engage in audacious projects to hold back, against seemingly insurmountable odds, the findings of an avalanche of research.
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/320/cpsprodpb/781D/production/_103094703_measles-spl.jpg

They argue that the Holocaust (and other genocides) never happened, that anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change is a myth, that Aids either does not exist or is unrelated to HIV, that evolution is a scientific impossibility, and that all manner of other scientific and historical orthodoxies must be rejected.
Not all denialists are taking these steps towards open acknowledgment of their desires. In some fields, the commitment to repressing desire remains strong. We are not yet at a stage when a climate change denier can come out and say, proudly, “Bangladesh will be submerged, millions will suffer as a result of anthropogenic climate change, but we must still preserve our carbon-based way of life, no matter what the cost.” Nor are anti-vaxxers ready to argue that, even though vaccines do not cause autism, the death of children from preventable diseases is a regrettable necessity if we are to be released from the clutches of Big Pharma.
The work to develop denialist arguments involves action to produce “scientific facts” that support anti-orthodox claims. The “pursuit of truth” may be available as a common starting point for co-operation between opposing “scholarship”. Let’s hope so.

References

(2018, August 17). Why so many people practice 'denialism' | CBC Radio - CBC.ca. Retrieved August 19, 2018, from https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thesundayedition/the-sunday-edition-august-19-2018-1.4784795/why-so-many-people-practice-denialism-1.4788057
(2018, May 1). Denial: The Unspeakable Truth - Keith Kahn Harris. Retrieved August 19, 2018, from http://www.kahn-harris.org/books/denial-unspeakable-truth/
(2018, August 3). Denialism: what drives people to reject the truth | News | The Guardian. Retrieved August 19, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/aug/03/denialism-what-drives-people-to-reject-the-truth
(2018, August 20). Measles cases hit record high in Europe - BBC News - BBC.com. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from https://www.bbc.com/news/health-45246049
(2018, August 19). Tonight's Weather Forecast: Unseasonably Hot Till 2022 — ALERT. Retrieved August 21, 2018, from http://alert-conservation.org/issues-research-highlights/2018/8/19/tonights-weather-forecast-unseasonably-hot-till-2022