Showing posts with label New Deal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Deal. Show all posts

Thursday, April 16, 2020

Guidelines for change after COVID-19

When Canada has put the COVID-19 crisis behind us, we will likely make changes in our attitudes toward how we restore our economy and what changes will better prepare us for the future.
Contemplate economic change

Merran Smith & Dan Woynillowicz offer an opinion on April 8 2020 in the National Observer that Canada should come out of COVID-19 with a new economy. The stark reality is that Canada’s traditionally strong oil and gas sector is confronted with both cyclical and structural change. It will never return to its halcyon boom days of the early 2000s. We need to shift from a mantra of “no barrel left behind” to one in which no oil worker or region is left behind. And we need to reorient and rebuild our energy sector with a focus on clean energy.
 To start, renewable power sources, energy storage and transmission lines. More public transit, walking paths and bike lanes. Clean fuel and renewable gas plants that draw on waste streams from forestry, agriculture and municipal garbage. Electric vehicle charging stations and a domestic zero-emission transportation industry that already spans buses, trucks, cars and ferries. Energy efficient homes, buildings and factories.
And for all this building, let’s use Canadian-made, low-carbon concrete and steel, or sustainably produced mass timber. Let’s use the metals and minerals abundant in Canada in those wind turbines, solar panels and batteries.
To build this workforce, we need support for training and retraining Canadians whose past jobs may not return. Many of these programs can and should start while unemployed workers are sitting at home.1
The Resilience web site discusses COVID-19 and a New New Deal. On a societal level, Covid-19 is opening doors and perceptions at unprecedented rates. This group urges us to amplify any insights and revelations that help us as a global society to use this shock to our future benefit.
 The original New Deal, led by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, established between 1933 and 1939, employed 8.5 million people, lifting them and their families from poverty. The New Deal became fundamental to a more progressive government; Social Security, banking regulations like the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, home loans, farm and rural programs, the Civilian Conservation Corps and a significant expansion of the National Park Service were just a few of the elements that led to a remarkable transformation of our government.2
Changes after COVID-19

During an Interview with Pope Francis on April 8, 2020 Austen Ivereigh asked whether it was possible to see an economy that is more human, and if the Pope sees the crisis and the economic devastation it is wreaking as a chance for an ecological conversion, for reassessing priorities and lifestyles.
 “every crisis contains both danger and opportunity: the opportunity to move out from the danger. Today I believe we have to slow down our rate of production and consumption (Laudato si’, 191) and to learn to understand and contemplate the natural world. We need to reconnect with our real surroundings. This is the opportunity for conversion...Yes, I see early signs of an economy that is less liquid, more human”, he adds,  “but let us not lose our memory once all this is past, let us not file it away and go back to where we were. This is the time to take the decisive step, to move from using and misusing nature to contemplating it. We have lost the contemplative dimension; we have to get it back at this time.”3

Sea level rise

Marc Stenger (Troyes, France), bishop president of Pax Christi International, reminds us that Pope Francis offers us this monumental gift of “Laudato Si” which could become more and more our Charter in the post-coronavirus era. Our responsibility as we define the new economy after the COVID-19 crisis is to contemplate a plan to restore greater concern for the economic health of all people and encourage our greater kinship with Nature and care of the planet.

References

1
(2020, April 8). Let's come out of COVID-19 with a new economy | National .... Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.nationalobserver.com/2020/04/08/opinion/lets-come-out-covid-19-new-economy 
2
(2020, March 25). COVID-19 and a New New Deal - Resilience. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.resilience.org/stories/2020-03-25/covid-19-and-a-new-new-deal/ 
3
(2020, April 8). Pope: How I am living through the Covid-19 pandemic .... Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2020-04/pope-how-i-am-living-through-the-covid-19-pandemic.html 
4
(2020, March 23). Covid 19 - Pax Christi International. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://paxchristi.net/2020/03/23/covid-19/ 

Wednesday, June 12, 2019

Political challenge to find common ground on climate

A scientist, people living along the Trans Mountain pipeline, and a social economic think tank have some opinions to share on the threats to the Canadian economy, world ecosystem, and future employment as we near the fall 2019 federal election.
Our conversion to care for the planet

Gerald Kutney, Ph.D. in chemistry, and author on climate change addresses conservative Canadians noting that Doug Ford and Andrew Scheer seem oblivious to the climate emergency threat. Canada had already responded to the issue of climate change by placing a price on carbon, endorsed by Nobel-prize-winning economist Patricia Espinosa.
The younger generation also recognizes the urgency of climate change, as witnessed by the youth movement under the hashtag #FridayForFutures, inspired by 16-year-old Swedish activist Greta Thuneberg. A student in the large turnout in Montreal, Maria Burgos, declared that: "The politicians, the older generation, they can pass this off on us. We won't stand here and do the same for our children and grandchildren."
The science of climate change, as with all science, is apolitical, by definition. Yet, climate change has become mired in a political battle royale. Conservative politicians seem oblivious to this threat or are willing to put politics ahead of people and the planet. We are but several months away from the election, and Andrew Scheer still has no plan to address climate change.1 
Anna Maria Tremonti of CBC The Current recently travelled the 1,150 km route of the Trans Mountain pipeline, to meet the people whose lives have become tangled up in the debate about its expansion. She presents a documentary that shares viewpoints from many sides of the debate. Susan Delacourt analyses the apparent “no middle ground” on this issue by identifying the short time frame of an election and what the public normally thinks is a long term timeframe for caring for the environment.
Anna Maria Tremonti recently travelled the 1,150 km route of the Trans Mountain pipeline, to meet the people whose lives have become tangled up in the debate about its expansion.The federal government is expected to make a final decision about the Trans Mountain pipeline by next Tuesday. Our national affairs panel discusses how pipeline politics, and competing climate change strategies, will be major issues in this year's federal election. In the final half hour of the program Susan Delacourt comments on no middle ground in this debate Mia Rabson notes that people are not backing the climate science because we don’t like to change what we are doing. Susan Delacourt observes that politics is short term business and environment is perceived to be a long term thing. Recent events remind us of the 11 years the IPCC has given for us to act. 2 
Brendan Haley reports that the history of the original “New Deal” teaches us that guaranteeing economic and social security can be part of a political bargain that enables the take-off of green energy technologies.
Today, green energy innovation has progressed at an impressive pace. The price of renewable energy technologies has decreased dramatically, and some predict that the cost of owning an electric car will be on par with a gasoline counterpart by 2022. Yet, politicians and vested interests are aggressively exploiting economic insecurities over jobs and affordability. The history of the original “New Deal” teaches us that guaranteeing economic and social security can be part of a political bargain that enables the take-off of green energy technologies.
However, the new “New Deal” has to devise social and economic security arrangements that fit with the green technologies we want to promote, and the insecurities faced today. This calls for imagining a new suite of social welfare initiatives that accelerate green transitions and change the political conversation.3 
In discussing, on CBC Mainstreet Nova Scotia, his new book “Falter”, a powerful and sobering call to arms, to save not only our planet but also our humanity itself, Bill McGibbon urges government to address the need to provide employment to those people who lose jobs during the transition to a low carbon emission world.
Some conservative climate principles

In the medium term, the alternate energy industry is expected to increase from the approximately 300,000 Canadians who are currently working in the field.

References

1
(2019, March 27). Dear Conservatives, Climate Change Is The Real Threat, Not A .... Retrieved June 8, 2019, from https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/gerald-kutney/conservatives-climate-change-carbon-tax_a_23696033/
2
(2019, June 12). The Current for June 12, 2019 | CBC Radio - CBC.ca. Retrieved June 12, 2019, from https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-june-12-2019-1.5171049
3
(2019, June 11). Blog | Broadbent Institute. Retrieved June 12, 2019, from https://www.broadbentinstitute.ca/blog